Instagram head tells Congress other apps are bad for kids, too

The head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, told Congress on Wednesday that the devastating effect his app has had on young people should really be blamed on the entire industry. “But, mom, we were all doing it!”

Mosseri faced questions before the Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security about Instagram’s effect on young people’s mental health. His overwhelming response was that Congress overstated the damage Instagram has on young people and, in the end, the blame should fall on the entire industry, not just Instagram. 

“The reality is that keeping young people safe online is not just about one company,” Mosseri said on Wednesday. He said that child safety was an “industry-wide issue.”

He said Instagram, and companies like it, “should have to adhere to these standards” to earn protections under Section 230, which protects tech companies from being legally liable for what users post on their platforms. He also said more teens are now using TikTok and YouTube than they are Instagram, anyway.

“We’ve been calling for regulation for nearly three years now, and from where I sit, there’s no area more important than youth safety,” he said.

It’s true that other social media platforms, including Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube, are responsible for some of the negative effects for kids online. But Instagram isn’t like those other apps — it’s one specifically built for photos, and there is some proof that Instagram has a very specific effect on young people.

But documents from Facebook’s own research leaked to the Wall Street Journal as part of their series called “The Facebook Files,” found that “Instagram is harmful to a sizable percentage of [teens], most notably teenage girls.” It also revealed that social comparison and body image issues impact teens more than adults, with some of the most “intense experiences” being social comparison, loneliness, stress and depression. Nearly half of all teen girls on Instagram feel they “often or always compare their appearance” to others on the platform, and a third “feel intense pressure to look perfect.”

Meanwhile, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported an epidemic of suicide among people in the U.S. aged 10 to 24 years old. After a stable period from 2000 to 2007, the rate of suicide among that age group increased by 56 percent from 2007 to 2017, making suicide the second leading cause of death for young people, following accidents, according to the CDC. 

We don’t know for certain why suicide has become such a crisis for young people, and Mosseri argued against the notion that there was any tie between Instagram and suicide during his Wednesday hearing. But experts attribute part of the rise to social media and Instagram’s own research showed that among users who said they had suicidal thoughts, 6 percent in the U.S. traced those thoughts back to Instagram. A quarter of teens who said they didn’t feel “good enough” said those thoughts started on Instagram, the Guardian reported.

Instagram has been making moves to make the app safer for young people. In May, they let users hide like counts on their posts or on posts in their feed, but it didn’t actually depressurize the platform. Realistically, removing likes without getting rid of other elements of quantified popularity doesn’t actually cover enough ground to make a lasting impact. The company also recently dropped their attempt at Instagram Kids, which would have been a modified version of the app for young people that included additional controls. That came under fire during Wednesday’s hearing, but Mosseri still seems to think it’s a good idea to create a safe social media environment for young people — Instagram Kids might just not be the best answer.

And, just the day before his hearing, Mosseri announced new tools and features designed to keep young people safe on Instagram. These tools include nudging teens towards different topics, a Take A Break feature, and tools for parents to track the amount of time their kids spend online.

If you want to talk to someone or are experiencing suicidal thoughts, Crisis Text Line provides free, confidential support 24/7. Text CRISIS to 741741 to be connected to a crisis counselor. Contact the NAMI HelpLine at 1-800-950-NAMI, Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. ET, or email info@nami.org. You can also call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255. Here is a list of international resources.

The best robot vacuum deals live as of Dec. 8: Many Black Friday prices are still live

UPDATE: Dec. 8, 2021, 5:35 p.m. EST This story has been updated to reflect current prices and availability.

We’ve compiled the best deals on robot vacuums from brands like iRobot, Shark, and Ecovacs. Here are the ones to grab as of Dec. 8:

  • BUDGET PICK: The iRobot Roomba 692 offers a standard, reliable cleaning for under $175 — $174.99 $299.99 (save $125)

  • BUDGET SELF-EMPTYING PICK: The compact Shark EZ RV1912S offers auto-emptying at one of the best prices we’ve seen this season — $299.99 $549.99 (save $250)

  • BEST ROBOT VACUUM/MOP DEAL: The Ecovacs Deebot T8+ Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-Empty Station uses smart upgrades to get you your best clean, then empties out the mess on its own — $549.99 $749.99 (save $200)


Only three things are certain in life: Death, taxes, and a few days each month when you need to vacuum but just don’t have time. Whether you detest the chore or get a little bummed when you can’t have that satisfying dance with your Dyson, a robot vacuum is a lifesaver. Shop models on sale below.

Robot vacuums under $200:

Black robot vacuum and phone on iRobot screen on white background

Credit: iRobot

Our pick: iRobot Roomba 692

$174.99 at Amazon (save $125)

Why we like it

We’re pumped to welcome back the cheapest Roomba we’ve seen this season. The 694 is part of iRobot’s entry-level series, offering a standard clean to keep floors tidy on a daily basis. Cleanings can be scheduled in the app based on your needs. The only difference between the 694 ($179.99) and the 692 is that the latter doesn’t include an extra filter.

More robot vacuums under $200

  • Eufy Robovac 11S Robot Vacuum — $149.99 $229.99 (save $80)

  • Shark RV765 Connected Robot Vacuum — $159.99 $259.99 (save $100)

  • Ecovacs Deebot 500 Robot Vacuum — $189.99 $279.99 (save $90)

  • Eufy Robovac 15C Max Robot Vacuum — $159.99 $279.99 (save $120)

  • Eufy Robovac G30 Robot Vacuum — $189.99 $319.99 (save $130)

  • iRobot Roomba 670 — $177 $329.99 (save $152.99)

  • iRobot Roomba 694$179 $274 (save $95)

  • Tzumi ionVac SmartClean V4–Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum — $199 $399.99 (save $200.99)

Robot vacuums under $500

Dark grey robot vacuum with dock on white background

Credit: Shark

Our pick: Shark EZ Robot Vacuum with Self-Empty Base

$299.99 at Best Buy (save $250)

Why we like it

$299.99 is a stellar price for a self-emptying robot vacuum — and from a brand like Shark at that. The EZ vacuum isn’t decked out with features, but cleans efficiently and returns to dirty areas that need more work. Its auto-empty dock is compact and less of an eyesore than those of other Sharks.

More robot vacuums under $500

  • Yeedi Vac Robot Vacuum — $209.99 $299.99 (save $90)

  • Roborock E4 Robot Vacuum — $179.99 $299.99 (save $120)

  • iRobot Roomba i3 Robot Vacuum — $299 $399.99 (save $100.99)

  • iRobot Roomba i1+ — $349 $599.99 (save $250.99)

  • Neato Robotics D8 Robot Vacuum — $349.99 $599.99 (save $250)

  • iRobot Roomba i3+ — $499 $599.99 (save $100.99)

  • iRobot Roomba i6 — $379.99 $549.99 (save $170)

  • Shark IQ Self-Empty Base Robot Vacuum — $399.99 $599.99 (save $200)

  • iRobot Roomba j7 — $449 $649.99 (save $200.99)

Robot vacuums under $800

New Roomba with compact auto-empty dock

Credit: iRobot

Our pick: iRobot Roomba j7+

$649 at Amazon (save $200.99)

Why we like it

The new face in town is the Roomba j7+. Just released in Sept. 2021, the j7+ is now seeing its second big discount (24% off versus the 18% off we saw in early November). The glow-up consists of Genius Technology and PrecisionVision Navigation to avoid obstacles that were previously problem-causers, like pet waste and cords. The j7+ also self-empties.

More robot vacuums under $800:

  • Samsung Jet Bot+ — $649 $799 (save $150)

Robot vacuums under $1,000

  • iRobot Roomba s9+ — $899 $1,299.99 (save $400.99)

Robot vacuum and mop hybrids and dedicated robot mops

Black robot vacuum on white background

Credit: Ecovacs

Our pick: Ecovacs Deebot T8+

$549.99 at Best Buy (save $200)

Why we like it:

The Deebot T8+ includes fundamental smart upgrades like LiDAR mapping and virtual boundaries for customizing its cleaning path down to specific rooms or areas. It also has sensors that avoid carpets while mopping and uses 3D obstacle detection to avoid small objects that cheaper vacs usually trip over.

More hybrids and robot mops on sale

  • Coredy R750 Robot Vacuum and Mop — $191.24 $320.99 (save $129.75)

  • Roborock E4 Robot Vacuum and Mop — $219.99 $379.99 (save $160)

  • iRobot Braava Jet M6 Robot Mop — $349.99 $449.99 (save $100)

  • Roborock S5 Max Robot Vacuum and Mop — $379.99 $549.99 (save $170)

  • Yeedi Vac Station Robot Mop with Self Empty — $349.99 $599.99 (save $200)

  • Ecovacs Deebot N8 Pro+ Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-Empty Station — $489.99 $799.99 (save $310)

  • Roborock S6 Pure Robot Vacuum and Mop — $359.99 $599.99 (save $240)

  • iRobot Roomba i7 and iRobot Brava Jet m6 package — $854.98 $1049.98 (save $195)

  • iRobot Roomba s9+ Robot Vacuum and iRobot Braava Jet M6 bundle — $1,099 $1,599.99 (save $500.99)

Are robot vacuums worth it?

The control of an upright vacuum comes with its own type of satisfaction. But if you’re not one to classify cleaning as cathartic, a robot vacuum could erase that huge, agonizing task from of your chore list. (And did we mention the joy of having “first day clean” floors all the time?)

But whether robot vacuums are worth it or not comes with a caveat: It can’t be just any robot vacuum. A cheap robovac that doesn’t do the job right — scattering dust, bumping into walls, getting stuck on area rugs — might actually create more work for you.

What to consider when buying a robot vacuum

  • Suction power: A vacuum is the one purchase that you hope sucks a lot. Suction power is typically measured in Pascals (Pa), ranging between 600 Pa to 2,500 Pa. Stronger sucking will be needed to pick up heavier pieces of debris (be sure to set up a barrier around Legos) and to pull matted-down pet hair from rugs.

  • Floor type: Carpeting and high pile rugs will probably require stronger suction than hard floors, as well as special features like an extra-wide or self-cleaning brush roll to prevent hair from wrapping and clogging. Folks in homes with multiple floor types might consider a bigger, sturdier robot vacuum that can hurl itself and its wheels over mats, rugs, and transitions from carpet to hard floors.

  • Home layout: Every robot vacuum is equipped with sensors and drop detection. But if your home has lots of rooms, lots of turns, or lots of close-together furniture, you’ll have fewer navigation issues with an advanced model that uses intelligent mapping to remember exactly how your home is laid out, including labeling of specific rooms, mental notes of staircases, and ability to deploy zone cleaning.

  • Low-profile furniture: No one should have to be scared about what’s accumulated under their couch over the past year. A robot vacuum measuring three inches or less in height should be able to scoot under most low-hanging couches and beds.

  • Battery life and square footage: One of the main complaints people have about their robot vacuum is that it craps out in the middle of the floor. Larger spaces require more time to clean, and it all depends on how annoyed you’ll be if it only finishes a few rooms at a time. Average run times for the list below range between 90 and 150 minutes, which translate to about 500 and 2,600 square feet covered on one charge.

  • App control: WiFi-enabled robot vacuums can be synced with a smartphone app to control scheduling, manual start, cleaning settings, as well as telling your vac to make its rounds when you’re not home. Low-end models that don’t connect to WiFi will usually come with a separate remote. If you’re used to asking Alexa or Google to turn off the lights or tell you the weather, a model with voice integration will blend in nicely.

Explore related content:

  • The best robot vacuums for every budget

  • Samsung’s Jet Bot AI+ robot vacuum is a must-have for pet owners

  • Get a 70-inch Samsung for under $600, plus other great 4K TV deals as of Dec. 8

Our favorite video games of 2021, ‘ranked’ (as if)

It’s been a strange year for video games.

There’s no way for any of us to know just how much release schedules were impacted by the pandemic, but there’s no doubt whatsoever that changes had to be made. A nixxed feature here, a shifted release date there. The year-plus spent at the mercy of COVID was an inescapable chaos agent.

Despite that, or perhaps in some cases because of it, 2021 dished out a rollercoaster of dark horses and unexpectedly god-tier releases. Again and again, games that no one saw coming or which had been written off for whatever reason defied expectations.

It’s been an unanticipated delight, but it also made the job of whittling down a list of our 10 favorites that much harder. Truth be told, there’s no rhyme or reason to this list. We’re presenting them in a reverse order counting down, but there’s really no distance between the 10th pick and the first pick. Every one of these is a winner that’s worthy of your time.

10. Deathloop

Just to drive home the idea that there’s practically zero distance between 10 and one, let’s start with a clear Game of the Year candidate in many people’s minds: Deathloop.

This time-twisting sandbox feels like a mash-up of all the best ideas from developer Arkane, the studio behind the Dishonored series and 2017’s Prey reboot. As Colt, players clash with a hostile cult on the island of Blackreef, a curious stretch of land where time loops back on itself every 24 hours. Colt’s only hope for escape is killing off every one of the cult’s Visionaries during a single loop.

That’s easier said than done. Players wield a mix of traditional firearms and significantly-less-than-traditional superpowers as they explore Blackreef and hunt for clues leading to the so-called “golden path” of carefully timed bloody ends for each Visionary. It all plays like a first-person shooter a lot of the time, but in actuality it’s an enormous, violent puzzle box. Structurally unique and filled with clever ideas that come to life in Blackreef’s intoxicating sandbox, Deathloop is Arkane’s strongest effort to date.

9. Life is Strange


Credit: deck nine / square enix

Life is Strange has always been a video game series that not only sees the best in people but in its own medium as well. More than any installment before it, though, True Colors is a mature, nuanced exploration of embodied empathy, both as an IRL phenomenon and a staple of video game narratives.

Protagonist Alex Chen’s superpowered empathy is like a hypersensitive vibe check detector, allowing her to tap into the strong emotional states emanating from people’s colorful auras. It’s a brilliant narrative device for a medium that struggles so much with finding organic ways to explore characters’ interiority, and it’s much more engaging than the diaries or journals that tend to try to fill this role in other games.

As we continue to wrestle with the ongoing, collective grief of the global pandemic, we need art that reflects the brutal reality of not only loss but of feeling way too much all the time. Maybe, just maybe, we can even learn a thing or two from Alex about how it really does take a village to recover from shared traumas. —Jess Joho, Staff Writer

8. Hitman III

Yes, Hitman III is a 2021 release, it dropped on Jan. 20. And yes it’s totally OK if you forgot, because what is time anymore?

For a guy like Agent 47, star of the Hitman series, time is precious. Hitman III is fundamentally a puzzle game, just like its predecessors. The puzzle is always the same: Figure out how to kill a target without getting caught. The solution, on the other hand, is limited only by the tools before you and your creativity in making them work for you.

Hitman III is the best example of the series to date, with developer IO Interactive roping everything it learned from the previous two games in its now-concluded trilogy to deliver a collection of targets and hit locations that push the series’ core premise to its limits. One assignment deposits 47 in a map with multiple targets that all need to be identified in the field. Another flips the script on how the series works and turns everyone into a target. Again and again, Hitman III defies expectations by breaking its own rules.

7. Unsighted

There is no greater and less controllable source of stress in life than time. Despite its apparent abundance on a grand scale, as individuals we never have enough of it and making more time for one person almost always means taking it away from another. Therein lies the genius of Unsighted, one of the year’s best and most under-discussed games: You never have enough time for everyone, until you do.

The product of a two-woman team in Brazil called Studio Pixel Punk (Editor’s note: Publisher Humble Games and Mashable are both subsidiaries of the same parent company.), Unsighted stars Alma, an android woman with hazy memories and a killer sword swing. She must traverse a futuristic city in ruins from an overhead perspective to stop the process of her and all her robot friends slowly losing the sentience that was bestowed upon them by a meteor crash years before the start of the game.

It’s easy to call Unsighted a combo of 2D Legend of Zelda-style exploration and puzzle solving and Dark Souls-like stamina-based combat, but the secret sauce is a universal time limit. Alma and every other friendly NPC you encounter have a timer showing how long they have left before they go unsighted, losing sentience and becoming functionally dead.

Time is always ticking, whether you’re solving puzzles in a dungeon, crafting items, or fighting one of the game’s several excellent bosses. This might sound like a nightmare, but Unsighted is so intrinsically fun to play that you learn to live with it. Snappy, reflexive combat with surprisingly deep customization is met with overhead platforming — which is often a recipe for disaster — that feels way better than it should. To top it all off, the game’s crafting system and world design are intentionally designed to facilitate speedruns, letting knowledgeable players create puzzle-solving items from scratch and find literal backdoors to each dungeon right from the start of the game.

You definitely won’t be able to save everyone in your first playthrough. Play intelligently and skillfully afterward, however, and you definitely can. It’s so immaculately designed and satisfying as hell to play that you’ll be itching for a second playthrough before long. —Alex Perry, Tech Reporter

6. Riders Republic

This one’s technically a twofer because we couldn’t decide on just one. Riders Republic from Ubisoft and Forza Horizon 5 from Playground Games are simpatico experiences that both embrace a philosophy of setting players loose in a massive open world and allowing them to chart their own path through the game.

In Riders, this takes the form of an anything-goes lineup of extreme sports, from snowboarding to mountain biking to wingsuit flights. It embraces a generous attitude toward failure, largely in the name of letting players go really, really fast as often as they want. As Mashable’s own Alex Perry said in our review, that makes for some delicious comedy.

Forza Horizon 5 is pretty much the same deal, but for cars. It lacks the inherent comedy you get from Riders‘ over-the-top spills, but it makes up for that by showering players with a steady, nearly relentless stream of new cars to play with. There are jumps, there are straightaways, there are drift courses and offroad rally tracks. All of it unfolds inside a beautifully rendered, geographically diverse video game take on Mexico that you’re free to explore at your own pace.

5. Psychonauts 2

Mashable Image


Credit: double fine / xbox

Psychonauts 2 is one of the year’s must-play experiences: It’s a thoughtful, digestible, empathetic handling of human emotions that renders the inner life of different characters as mental worlds where Raz, the game’s hero, helps others fight whatever is plaguing their mind. Its colorful and frequently comedic execution exemplifies how we can talk about mental health with a sense of levity, absent of any and all judgment.

Most of the people you set out to help are struggling with all-too-familiar challenges of their own. Like a lot of emotional distress, these challenges are often invisible until you peek inside their psyches to see what’s up. You might find a man who’s consumed with feelings of abandonment, or a woman who has changed her personality to fill so many different roles that she doesn’t recognize herself anymore.

Psychonauts 2 doesn’t preach to you. It doesn’t judge your knowledge of the intricacies of mental health and emotional intelligence, or lack thereof. It just presents you with the tools to build on your understanding and do the work yourself, so that you can ideally use them when you finally do put the controller down. —Dylan Haas, Shopping Reporter

4. Unpacking

My first experience with Unpacking was watching someone else play it. Once they explained the premise of the game — unpack moving boxes for a nameless protagonist and find space for her stuff in the various places she’s lived — they showed me which level they were working on. The apartment was modern, glassy, and kind of sterile in that fancy high-rise sort of way. I thought it meant the protagonist was doing well for herself. Then I saw the closet.

The closet was stuffed with men’s clothing and each drawer was occupied with a few pairs of briefs. Whoever the protagonist was moving in with didn’t want to give up any of his closet space. He also didn’t compromise on the bathroom storage or condense his obnoxious coffee set to make space for his girlfriend’s stuff in the kitchen. The final straw came when the protagonist’s precious sketchpad could only fit stuffed in a drawer. “He’s stifling her, they’re wildly incompatible, and she needs to dump his ass,” I said.

All that from a handful of boxes.

Unpacking is a game of personal archaeology. The puzzle element of finding out where everything goes is only part of the experience; what the unpacked objects say about the protagonist’s life is what matters most. The story emerges over time and in the details — the slow decay of a stuffed animal as she brings it from place to place, her growing collection of coffee mugs, and, yes, the lack of storage space in her crappy boyfriend’s fancy apartment. Some of its most subtle revelations are also its most impactful. As a game, Unpacking is short but memorable. Good things do, after all, come in small packages. —Alexis Nedd, Senior Entertainment Reporter

3. Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy

If you want to talk about the surprises of 2021, Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy sure did pop in out of nowhere. The story-driven adventure with Marvel’s premiere cosmic superhero squad takes some character cues from the MCU, but its deep-diving story is much more heavily rooted in names, locations, and situations from Marvel Comics.

It’s got an unusual approach to combat, mixing action and tactics as players directly control Star-Lord while issuing orders to the rest of the team. Both pieces are necessary, as Star-Lord is an ineffectual fighter on his own in most cases. The net result is a somewhat clunky but nonetheless thematically appropriate handling of action that forces players to think about their team at all times.

The real standout, however, is Guardians‘ reverence for comic book lore and the tack-sharp story that’s built on top of it. This is a deeply rewarding journey for players willing to invest in listening to and learning about the main cast. It’s funny, heartfelt, devastating, and thrilling in equal measure. Thanks to a wide array of difficulty sliders and accessibility options, pretty much anyone can pick up Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy and have a good time, beginning to end.

2. The Artful Escape

Mashable Image


Credit: beethoven & dinosaur / annapurna interactive

The Artful Escape is simple on its face. All you really do for the length of its five- to six-hour playtime is walk from left to right, occasionally pausing to tackle very simple, very forgiving Simon Says-like button match challenges. You’re armed with a sweet electric guitar that you can shred with at the press of a button. And shred you will as Francis Vendetti, our protagonist and nephew to a Bob Dylan-esque music legend.

Also, you’re in outer space. Francis is a budding musician himself who’s grown frustrated with the shadow cast by his late uncle, and the expectations that shadow places on his shoulders. One evening, just before a big show, Francis meets a music-making spaceman who whisks him off on a deeply psychedelic adventure that involves bringing music to alien worlds.

What The Artful Escape lacks in traditional definitions of challenge it more than makes up for in personality and story execution. Francis embarks on his journey intent on escaping his dreary life, but the lessons he learns along the way about family, legacy, and finding one’s own voice are powerfully resonant, and propelled by an absolutely killer space-rock soundtrack.

1. Returnal

We started on a timeloop and we’re ending on a timeloop. Returnal, from developer Housemarque, is a tough game to play in 2021 as a PlayStation 5 exclusive, given the Sony console’s scarcity. It’s also a wrenchingly challenging and unforgiving game that plays like a mash-up of Hades and Geometry Wars. So even if you have the right hardware, there’s no guarantee you’ll be able to finish.

It’s worth the effort, however. In the realm of roguelikes, or games that lean heavily on repetition and running players through a randomly generated (yet somewhat predictable) combat gauntlet, Returnal stands out. It’s not just the arsenal that feels great, or the pile-up of tools that help you subvert traditional roguelike rules that reset progress every time you die. It’s also the story.

Returnal‘s plot is a constant surprise. It gets very unexpectedly meta more than once, and nearly every attempt to conquer its gauntlet rewards players with new shreds of story or clues that further clear up the mystery. In the end, everything you read, listen to, and puzzle over is just as engaging as the action, if not moreso.

All of the games listed here are superb experiences, but if I’m personally narrowing the field down to one? Returnal is it. We’re lucky to have it.

Honorable Mention: Halo Infinite

A late 2021 arrival that surely won’t be overlooked; it’s Halo, after all. But Master Chief’s latest adventure, and his first since 2015, isn’t simply a case of “more Halo.” Halo Infinite is developer 343 Industries, which took over for series creator Bungie in 2012, confidently putting its own stamp on the series.

This is still the Chief’s story, picking up after the events of 2015’s Halo 5 and going as hard on Halo history and lore as any other game in the series. Structurally, however, this is like no game in the series before. The Zeta Halo setting is a wide open space for exploration and mischief-making, and it ramps up the tactical possibilities in Halo‘s so-called “30 seconds of fun” to an incalculable degree. Plus, there’s a grappling hook now and it rules.

Then there’s the multiplayer. For the first time in its history, Halo is a free-to-play game. The popular PvP mode in Halo Infinite has felt its share of growing pains as it becomes a free game, but it’s almost all technical issues and purely superficial elements. The foundation of moment-to-moment gameplay is absolutely thrilling and near-perfectly balanced. This is the best Halo has been in almost a decade.

Get a 70-inch Samsung for under $600, plus other great 4K TV deals as of Dec. 8

UPDATE: Dec. 8, 2021, 4:55 p.m. EST This story has been updated to reflect current pricing, including some picks still at their Black Friday prices.

  • The Samsung 70-inch TU6958 Series 4K Crystal UHD TV offers enjoyable HDR on a big screen for a small price — $599.99 $749.99 (save $150)

  • The LG 65-inch C1 Series OLED 4K TV has dazzling picture that can keep up with gaming — $1,796.99 $2,499.99 (save $703)

  • The Insignia 70-inch F30 4K Fire TV operates on Amazon’s Fire TV platform and is cheaper than it was on Black Friday — $549.99 $749.99 (save $200)


Large 4K TVs no longer have to cost an exorbitant amount of money. Rather, these high-quality TVs featuring punchy colors, decipherable shadows, and smooth transitions are actually affordable for regular consumers. And to make them even more budget-friendly, we’ve gathered up the best deals on 4K and QLED TVs from top brands like Samsung, LG, Sony, and more.

Samsung TV deals

Samsung 4K TV with mountain on screen

Credit: Samsung

Our pick: Samsung 70-inch TU6958 Series 4K Crystal UHD TV

$599.99 at Best Buy (save $150)

Why we love it

A 70-inch TV from Samsung for less than $600? That should say it all. Though it’s not anything super fancy in the 4K category, the TU6985 Series still gets great reviews for being crisp and responsive for the price. This price could drop closer to $529.99 (we’re thinking of a 70-inch Samsung TV deal from Black Friday 2020), but the TV could also sell out before that happens.

More Samsung TVs on sale

  • Samsung 50-inch The Frame QLED TV — $849 $1,299.99 (save $450.99)

  • Samsung 55-inch 7 Series 4K TV — $399.99 $499.99 (save $100)

  • Samsung 55-inch Neo QLED QN85A Series smart TV — $1,297.99 $1,599.99 (save $320.99)

  • Samsung 55-inch Neo QLED QN90A Series 4K TV — $1,377 $1,799.99 (save $422)

  • Samsung 65-inch 7 Series 4K TV — $499.99 $649.99 (save $100)

  • Samsung 65-inch The Frame QLED TV — $1,597 $1,999.99 (save $420.99)

  • Samsung 70-inch Q60A Series QLED TV — $999.99 $1,349.99 (save $350)

  • Samsung 75-inch 7 Series 4K TV — $929.99 $1,099.99 (save $170)

  • Samsung 75-inch Q70A Series QLED TV — $1,699.99 $2,099.99 (save $400)

LG TV deals

LG TV with glowing tree screensaver

Credit: LG

Our pick: LG 65-inch C1 Series OLED 4K TV

$1,796.99 at Amazon (save $703)

Why we love it

The LG C1’s OLED display has more than 8 million pixels to bring you deep blacks and vibrant colors. Its 4K AI processor adjusts with the content to ensure everything you watch looks the best it can. Its zippy refresh rate keeps heavy-graphics gaming on point, too.

More LG TVs on sale

  • LG 48-inch A1 Series OLED 4K TV — $896.99 $1,199.99 (save $303)

  • LG 48-inch C1 Series OLED 4K TV — $1,196.99 $1,599.99 (save $403)

  • LG 55-inch NanoCell 80 4K TV — $676.99 $799.99 (save $123)

  • LG 55-inch A1 Series 4K OLED TV — $1,096.99 $1,299.99 (save $203)

  • LG 65-inch NanoCell 75 Series 4K TV — $729.99 $949.99 (save $220)

  • LG 65-inch 90 Series QNED Mini LED 4K TV — $1,599.99 $1,999.99 (save $400)

  • LG 70-inch NanoCell 75 Series 4K TV — $899.99 $1,199.99 (save $300)

Sony TV deals

Sony OLED TV with canyon in background

Credit: Sony

Our pick: Sony 55-inch X80J 4K TV

$599.99 at Best Buy (save $200)

Why we love it

Sony doesn’t often have the budget-friendly range that Samsung or LG do, so a 50-inch 4K TV for under $600 feels lucky. This X80J and the slightly more expensive X85J use different panels and offer different viewing experiences. If you care about wide viewing angles, this living room-sized X80J is the way to go.

More Sony TVs on sale before Black Friday

  • Sony 50-inch X85J 4K TV — $749.99 $849.99 (save $100)

  • Sony 55-inch X85J 4K TV — $849.99 $999.99 (save $150)

  • Sony 65-inch X85J 4K TV — $999.99 $1,199.99 (save $200)

  • Sony 65-inch X90J Bravia XR 4K TV — $1,298 $1,499.99 (save $201.99)

  • Sony 77-inch X80J OLED 4K TV — $2,999.99 $3,499.99 (save $500)

  • Sony 85-inch X95J Bravia XR 4K UHD — $3,999.99 $4,499.99 (save $5000)

Other TV deals from TCL, Vizio, and more

Insignia TV with Fire TV platform

Credit: Insignia

Our pick: Insignia 70-inch Class F30 4K Fire TV

$549 at Best Buy (save $200)

Why we love it

The 70-inch version of this Fire TV is $30 cheaper than it was for Black Friday and Cyber Monday. The F30 series is the latest version of one of the best bargain TVs available. (It’s not to be confused with Amazon’s Omni series). It makes content look crisper than a non-4K TV does — plus, it has the Fire TV platform built in.

More TVs from TCL, Vizio, and more before Black Friday

  • TCL 40-inch 1080p Smart TV — $229.99 $349.99 (save $120)

  • Insignia 43-inch 4K Fire TV — $269.99 $319.99 (save $50)

  • TCL 43-inch Class 4-Series 4K TV — $249.99 $349.99 (save $100)

  • Hisense 55-inch ULED U6G TV — $499.99 $649.99 (save $150)

  • Hisense 55-inch ULED U7G TV — $646.99 $849.99 (save $203)

  • Insignia 65-inch Class F30 4K Fire TV — $489.99 $699.99 (save $210)

  • Hisense 65-inch 65A6G 4K TV — $499.99 $599.99 (save $100)

Explore related content:

  • The best Apple deals as of Dec. 7: iPad, MacBook, Apple Watch, and more

  • The best 4K TVs: For gamers, Netflix binge-watchers, and everyone else

  • Your TV needs a soundbar. Here are our faves.

Congressman mockingly mentions ‘Mongoose Coin’ at cryptocurrency hearing so someone launched Mongoose Coin

If you had ” A Congressional hearing on cryptocurrency will launch a new cryptocurrency” on your Bingo card, then you are in luck.

On Wednesday, the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services held a hearing titled “Digital Assets and the Future of Finance: Understanding the Challenges and Benefits of Financial Innovation in the United States.” In short: The hearing was on cryptocurrency.

A half-dozen CEOs from cryptocurrency companies such as Coinbase, Bitfury, and FTX fielded questions from members of Congress concerning the future of the industry, regulatory concerns, how it will affect banking and financial services, and more.

However, one House member’s line of questioning will likely be remembered well after the hearing. 

“The number one threat to cryptocurrency is crypto,” began Rep. Brad Sherman, a Democratic Congressman from California. “Bitcoin could be displaced by Ether, which could be displaced by Doge which could be displaced by Hamster Coin and then there’s CobraCoin.”

“What could Mongoose Coin do to CryptoCoin?” he joked, explaining how he just made it up.

Well, now Mongoose Coin does exist.

Shortly after Rep. Sherman’s comments, a cryptocurrency called Mongoose Coin ($MONG) was created. Within just a few hours, Mongoose Coin now has a market cap of $2 million and is up 320,000 percent from launch.

Mongoose Coin charts

Mongoose Coin, which has only existed for a few hours, currently has a market cap of $2 million.
Credit: Mashable Screenshot / dexscreener

Hamster Coin is also up after the Congressman’s comments too. Unlike Mongoose Coin, HamsterCoin did exist prior to Rep. Sherman’s comments, which he acknowledged during the hearing even though he said he originally thought he was just making that one up, too.

Hamster Coin charts

Hamster Coin is also having a good day thanks to the Congressman.
Credit: Mashable Screenshot / coinmarketcap

Obviously Rep. Sherman jumbled his statements and didn’t stick the landing. But the point he was trying to make isn’t completely wrong. With fiat money, the U.S. dollar may be the standard global currency, but the national currencies of other countries will continue to have value based on the fact that those countries exist. In crypto, as we’ve seen time and time again, alternative coins flop, become worthless, and just disappear.

Congressional hearings are often the perfect fodder for internet memes. Remember how many times Mark Zuckerberg’s “Senator, we run ads” comment made its way around social media? What has more viral potential than old politicians explaining something that most tech-savvy young people already understand?

And, of course, memecoins are a thing. Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency that was essentially created as a joke, is the most well known example after its value came close to a dollar earlier this year.

But, Mongoose Coin combines it all: A memecoin created out of a Congressional hearing.

It’s totally absurd! Yet, at the same time, all signs points to Mongoose Coin being a classic crypto pump and dump, so some people may very well lose a significant amount of money here thanks to this very “funny” meme.

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Was your iPhone repaired with official parts? New iOS update will tell you.

An upcoming iOS update will tell you the repair history for your iPhone, including if it contains official replacement parts or “unknown” third-party components. 

On Tuesday, Apple published a new support document outlining the “iPhone parts and service history” feature coming to iOS 15.2. Users will be able to go to Settings > General > About to view a new information panel containing their iPhone’s repair history. 

The repair history’s most noteworthy function is how it can detect if an iPhone contains “non genuine parts.” The information panel will display a warning symbol alongside the words “Unknown part.” The same warning will be used if iOS detects a replacement part that was previously used in another iPhone, a malfunctioning component, or an incomplete installation.

The feature will be especially handy if you buy a used iPhone, as the information panel will immediately tip you off if the device was ever repaired with questionable parts. 

The feature also might push third-party repair services to source their components from Apple instead of unauthorized suppliers. Starting next year, Apple will begin offering a “self service repair” store that’ll let consumers buy official replacement parts for iPhones and Macs. 

The iOS 15.2 update is currently in beta testing. Apple adds that if your iPhone was repaired with a genuine part, you’ll be able to tap the component to see more information, including the date of the service. “If the battery, display, or camera have not been replaced, then you won’t see parts and service history,” the company said.

However, the repair history feature will be limited by your iPhone model. Owners of the iPhone 12 or 13 will see a repair history for their device’s battery, display, and camera. But iPhone 11 customers will only be able to view battery and display repair history. Those with an iPhone XR, XS, XS Max, and second-gen iPhone SE will only have access to the battery repair history. 

Despite its upcoming self-service repair store, Apple still recommends that consumers visit a “professional repair provider with certified technicians who use genuine Apple parts” when it comes to fixing their iPhones. 

In the same support document, Apple adds: “Replacements not performed by Apple, authorized service providers, or certified technicians might not follow proper safety and repair procedures and could result in improper function or overall device safety.”

Nevertheless, Apple does plan on selling repair tools and manuals for the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 before expanding to Macs built with Apple’s M1 chips.

Teens don’t need ‘finstas’ anymore

From 2015 to 2018 finstas ruled the teenage digital landscape. Slang for fake Instagram accounts, finstas were the first place teens would post photos they didn’t want to share on main. Creating a finsta was a rite of passage, and following someone’s shadow feed felt like you were really part of their close inner circle. 

Finstas recently became newsworthy again in September following a Senate hearing to address the mental health effects of Instagram on teens. That’s when Sen. Richard Blumenthal asked Antigone Davis, Facebook’s global head of safety, a pointed, if not slightly misguided, question: “Will you commit to ending finsta?”

But if you ask any teen, they’ll probably tell you that finsta is already a dated concept.

In a 2021 survey from financial services firm Piper Sandler, only 22 percent of teenagers said Instagram was their favorite social media platform, coming in third after Snapchat and TikTok, respectively. Compare that with the results of Piper Sandler’s 2015 data that show Instagram at the top of the list among teenagers, with 33 percent of participants claiming the photo-sharing app as their favorite. 


Finstas were popular at my high school and owning one felt like you were part of an elite inner circle. Having a finsta was a status symbol.

I created my finsta in 2014 at the beginning of my sophomore year of high school. I wanted a place to share silly photos with my friends — and to follow other people’s accounts. Finstas were popular at my school and owning one felt like you were part of an exclusive club. Having a finsta was a status symbol. I still have the account today, but I barely use it and most of the cohort of finstas that follow me are inactive. I would argue Instagram and its new norms ended finsta culture, or at least significantly decreased the necessity of a burner account. 

To test this theory, I posted a poll on my main Instagram to my followers, mostly between the ages of 19 and 26, asking if they ever had a finsta and if they still use it. A total of 118 people responded that at some point they had finstas, and only 35 of those people still use their accounts, or roughly 29 percent. 

Screenshot of my Instagram poll for this story.

I posed these questions to my followers who are mostly between 19 and 26 years old.
Credit: Instagram / Elena Cavender

Screenshot of my Instagram poll for this story.

Credit: Instagram / Elena Cavender

Why did they stop using their finsta accounts? For starters, the app evolved. Instagram introduced Close Friends Stories in 2018, making it easier to post a story to your chosen Close Friends list than manage an entire second account. Snapchat also added the ability to share private stories in 2017. 

Additionally, rallying cries of “make Insta casual” on TikTok in 2020 and the popularity of photo dumps on Instagram further made the finsta obsolete. Not to mention, Instagram as a platform has become less about sharing photos and more about shopping

To me, finstas are a distinctly high school phenomenon, a relic of the teenage experience. So I wondered if high school students today still had a use for finstas — and if they still play a crucial role in high school dynamics. 


I don’t think I have much to say on my finsta, and anything I want to post I can post anywhere else.

Among Gen Z cuspers like myself, a couple of years makes all the difference in your social media habits. In August, amid the rush of college freshmen moving into their dorms, I saw so many TikToks on my FYP of teens complaining about their roommates. My initial reaction was that this type of thing should be posted on finsta, not TikTok — where your roommate could easily see it — but younger Gen Z doesn’t seem to fear their digital footprint the way I did. Instead of posting an embarrassing anecdote to their 30 closest friends, teens today share it on TikTok with the hopes of going viral or on Snapchat where images are deleted after viewing them and you’re incentivized to keep streaks with your contacts. 

Emma Condit, a 19-year-old student at UC Davis, stopped using her finsta in May 2021. “I don’t think I have much to say on my finsta, and anything I want to post I can post anywhere else,” Condit told Mashable. “Instead of posting on my finsta now I post on my Close Friends story or on Twitter.”

It’s not only college students who are abandoning their finstas. Lilabel Kierstead, a 14-year-old high school student in Western Massachusetts, told Mashable, “There was a point where finstas were at their peak, which was probably between 2016 and 2018. People definitely still use finstas, but only once every couple of months. There’s just not as much appeal to it as there used to be.” Now, Kierstead uses her private Snapchat story. 


Finstas may have fallen out of favor among Gen Z, but their impact can still be felt. They created a culture of cultivating secondary online accounts, private spaces where you could express yourself away from the prying eyes of adults.

Rachel Barton, a 17-year-old high school senior in the San Francisco Bay Area, agrees. “I remember finstas being more popular when I was a freshman or sophomore in high school,” she told Mashable. “My friends and I use [our] close friends stories now, and they are definitely used more than finstas.”

Finstas may have fallen out of favor among Gen Z, but their impact can still be felt. They created a culture of cultivating secondary online accounts, private spaces where you could express yourself away from the prying eyes of adults. They were also a double-edged sword: On the one hand, a finsta allows you to be a more authentic version of yourself; but there’s also pressure to use your finsta to brag about the unsavory behavior you couldn’t post on main.

“I had a finsta and every guy at my high school did, too, at least all the guys that would party. They’d post party pics and about drugs [on their accounts],” said Dan Willet, a 22-year-old who went to high school in Santa Barbara, California.  

To understand the finsta phenomenon, I dusted off my own account and scrolled all the way back to 2014. I couldn’t help but cringe. 

Screenshot of a post I made on my finsta in 2014 about getting Taylor Swift tickets for Christmas

One of many dramatic posts on my finsta. I posted this when I was 14 and recieved Taylor Swift tickets for Christmas.
Credit: Instagram / Elena Cavender

In high school, I primarily complained about student government and posted the occasional odd party picture on my finsta. I was most active on the account during my first semester of college. On my main feed, it seemed like all of my former classmates from high school were thriving in college, and I felt isolated in my struggle to adjust. My finsta was a safe haven where everyone I followed was being honest about how awkward those first few months of university were. Once I acclimated, I mainly used my finsta to stay in touch with my friends from home and post inside jokes with my new college friends. 

Now, most of the accounts that follow my finsta are inactive, so if I were to post on that account no one would see it. If I want to share a random thought, I just tweet it. Or I post it on my main account, where sharing hot takes and memes has become the new norm. 

Lexi Shannon created her finsta in 2016 right before her high school graduation. “I mostly used it to post memes and shitpost about high school,” she told Mashable over Twitter DM. “Once I got into college that fall it transitioned into a place to mass update all my high school friends at once on the shit I was doing.”

Shannon has since retired her finsta. “It just got tiring,” she explained. “I’m 23 now, so it had been about 5 years of [using my] finsta. It was always nice to go back and look at the memories I made and only talked about there, but I really just wanted to leave that chapter locked inside the memory of that account.”

Shannon makes a great point: Finstas documented my microgeneration’s adolescence. They are a photo diary full of forgotten memories, past obsessions, and friends you’ve fallen out of touch with — not necessarily the people and behavior you want to be reminded of into adulthood. 


I really just wanted to leave that chapter locked inside the memory of that account.

For 22-year-old Flora Elmcolone, finsta culture led to an immense amount of social pressure, especially for young women. “There was something distinctly sexualizing about finstas in high school—in my experience there was pressure to choose some kind of sexual pun for your name which meant I was always brainstorming clever ways to literally degrade myself, so that my finsta would be seen as cool/fun,” wrote Elmcolone over DM. 

Elmcolone still uses her finsta as a place to post random photo dumps. Victoria Gusciora, a 23-year-old support worker in the San Francisco Bay Area, also keeps her finsta active. Why? Because the emotional and mental stakes are lower when she logs into that account. Now that they past their prime, the only people who post to their finsta are the ones who actually care about the community, and freedom, they found through it.

“I don’t know if I will ever be able to post something to 900 people without being anxious about it,” explained Gusciora. “But I can post something to 25 people and feel really good about it on my private Instagram.”

Belkin’s speedy new chargers are worth it for Apple Watch Series 7 owners

If it were up to me, my devices’ batteries would harbor an unlimited power supply. But as this is impossible, I prefer my charging sessions to happen easily and quickly – and Belkin’s latest power products delivered just that.

Belkin recently released the Boost Charge Pro 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Pad ($149.99) and the Boost Charge Pro Portable Fast Charger for Apple Watch ($59.99). The Charging Pad is essentially a design update to the 3-in-1 Wireless Charger with MagSafe, a similar power product that Belkin released last year timed with the iPhone 12. However, this year’s iteration eliminates the floating design – making the device actually usable for iPhones older than the 12 – and implements a new fast charger for the Apple Watch Series 7.

SEE ALSO:

10 of the best fitness trackers for monitoring heart rate

The same fast charger is built into the semi-aptly named Portable Fast Charger, a standalone power supplier for the Apple Watch. While this charger will work with any Apple Watch, it is optimized for the Series 7’s fast charging technology.

As an experiment, I put the chargers to use on two Apple Watches – the Series 5 and Series 7 – as well as an iPhone and a set of AirPods. After pairings with both Belkin chargers and Apple’s own Watch charger, here’s how they performed, both in power delivery and ease of use.

How fast is Fast Charging, exactly?

One of the Apple Watch Series 7’s selling points was the brand new fast charging technology, which Apple claims allows up to 33 percent faster charging when compared to a Series 6. Both Belkin chargers incorporated this new tech and promised to deliver speedy power delivery. But “33 percent faster” is a little vague, so to make the speed difference jump out, I charged my watches in 15 minute increments on each charger and compared the battery increases in that time.

A collection of chargers, including the Belkin 3-in-1 pad, the Belkin Apple Watch Charger, the Apple Watch charger, a 20 watt USB-C adaptor, an iPhone 12, and two Apple Watches.

Every possible way to charge my devices.
Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

With no Series 6 on hand to compare with the Series 7, I had to do some math to figure out exactly how much faster the charging should be (and anyway, doesn’t an upgrade from a Series 5 to a series 7 feel more realistic?) I’ll spare you my actual pen-and-paper math work, but when all was said and done, I determined that if Apple’s claims hold true (and if my math checks out) the Series 7 should charge about 46.6 percent faster than the Series 5.

So does the real world battery charge rate measure up to the math, and what Apple and Belkin claim? I charged my devices in pretty much every possible configuration so I could answer that for you.

In terms of battery increases during my test, after 15 minutes of charging both watches on the Belkin Portable Fast Charger for Apple Watch, I saw:

  • A 36 percent increase on the Series 7

  • A 19 percent increase on the Series 5

Compared to charging the same watches on the included Apple Watch Series 5 charger, which yielded:

  • A 13 percent increase on the Series 7

  • A 12 percent increase on the Series 5

Now, it is important to note that both of these chargers also used different adaptors. I had the Portable Fast Charger hooked up to my 20W USB-C adaptor from Apple, while the included Apple Watch charger was attached to a standard 5W USB Apple adaptor. Using different adaptors almost certainly played a part in the differing charge times, but it was necessary in order to use each cable.

I also conducted a similar test with the 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Pad.

After 15 minutes charging three devices on the 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Pad, I saw:

  • A 23 percent increase on the Series 7

  • A 16 percent increase on the AirPods

  • An 18 percent increase on the iPhone 12

The results speak for themselves. Clearly, the slowest charger of the bunch was the included Apple Watch Series 5 charger, and the fastest was the Belkin Portable Fast Charger.

In terms of measuring up to Apple’s and Belkin’s claims, these chargers actually went above and beyond. To remind you, the Series 7 should charge approximately 46.6 percent faster than a Series 5 when using the fast charging tech. Comparing the Series 7 charging on the Portable Fast Charger to the Series 5 on the included Apple Watch charger, my test yielded a 66.6 percent faster charge rate. And even comparing the Series 7 and Series 5 both using the Belkin Portable Fast Charger, the Series 7’s fast tech still allowed for a 55 percent faster rate.

I didn’t compare the AirPods or iPhone 12 on their original chargers, as Belkin doesn’t claim to charge these any faster than normal. The most interesting difference between all of these results is that the Apple Watch Series 7 did charge fastest on the Portable Fast Charger, even compared to the other Belkin product, which also implements the fast charging technology.

White 20 watt USB-C adaptor from Apple on the left, black attached 15 watt adaptor from Belkin on the right.

The 20W Apple adapter on the left, the Belkin 15W adapter on the right.
Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

This is most likely explained by the fact that charging one device is almost always more powerful than three at once. I also had the Portable Fast Charger hooked up to my 20W USB-C adaptor from Apple – the charger only requires a 5W adaptor at minimum, so the additional wattage was a plus. The 3-in-1 Charging Pad comes hooked up to an included 15W adapter that provides plenty of power, and these days I appreciate almost any kind of included adapter (ahem, Apple!)

Overall, the chargers were super speedy and extremely easy to use. While one clearly charged faster than the other, I’m more than willing to trade a little speed for more devices charging simultaneously, or switch to the single charger if I really needed speed at that moment.

Both chargers are minimalist and feel luxe, but I did have one gripe.

Regarding each charger’s design, I had few complaints. While I think I personally prefer last year’s more unique floating design for the 3-in-1, I recognize the usefulness of the Charging Pad’s more classic flat look.

Last year's Belkin charger, white in color and with an aluminum T-bar design. Holding an iPhone 12 at a floating angle on the left MagSafe pad, the Apple Watch on the right pad, and AirPods on the bottom base.

Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

Black Belkin 3-in-1 charging pad, holding an iPhone, AirPods. and Apple Watch.

Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

The floating design made it so MagSafe was required; without it, your iPhone couldn’t adhere to the elevated charging pad. With the Charging Pad’s flat module, MagSafe is more of a nice bonus. If you have it on your iPhone 12 or newer, great! Enjoy your perfect alignment. If you don’t, no biggie. You can still lay an iPhone 11 or older right across the charger with no fear of it falling off. Regardless, the Charging Pad fits right in with a sleek home tech display.

Black flat Belkin Apple Watch charger, with the Apple Watch laid flat across it.

Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

Black Belkin Apple Watch charger with the Apple Watch in Nightstand mode, propped up vertically on the charger.

Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

The Portable Fast Charger sported a very similar matte black look as the Charging Pad, and I liked that both the standalone watch charger and the watch module on the Charging Pad allowed for the device to charge in the vertical Nightstand mode position. Not only does this look nice, but if you leave your Watch on either charger in this mode overnight, it also allows it to act as an alarm clock. The charger also adjusts for different heights in this mode, allowing bigger Apple Watches or those with a bumper case to easily rest vertically without risking misalignment.

My one gripe is not so much in the build of either charger, but in the misleading naming. You see, the Portable Watch Fast Charger does half of what its name suggests. It charges quite fast – we’ve proven that. But it is not, in fact, a portable charger.

When I first received the product, I thought this charger would be a portable power bank for the Apple Watch. The design even further confirmed this: The Portable Fast Charger sports a fantastic cord module that allows you to wind the 4 foot cable into the device, making it very compact and seemingly easy to whip out of a bag to charge while out and about.

The back of the Belkin charger for Apple Watch, black and showing the winded up cord in a circle module.

The 4 foot cord piles neatly and easily into the circle cutout in the back of the charger.
Credit: Jennimai Nguyen

However, Belkin only meant that this charger is portable in the sense that it is small and travels easily. The same goes for the 3-in-1 Charging Pad, which Belkin’s product description names as “take it anywhere” in that it, too, easily slips into a bag for travel due to its slim nature.

You can imagine my disappointment when I plopped my Apple Watch on the Portable Fast Charger sans connection to a power source only to discover it wouldn’t charge this way. It was even more frustrating when I found out that Belkin actually does have a true portable charger for Apple Watches – it just wasn’t this one.

While the Fast Charger performed great once I plugged it in, I wish it hadn’t fooled me into thinking I could take it on a road trip and power up my device. Just please don’t call something a portable charger when it isn’t really a portable charger!

So, is it worth it?

Despite that rather massive initial letdown, I do think that these latest chargers from Belkin are overall impressive. However, they’re really only useful if you specifically own the right devices, or don’t previously own similar chargers.

SEE ALSO:

7 wireless chargers that will juice up your phone crazy fast

Personally, I wouldn’t upgrade from last year’s 3-in-1 Belkin floating charger to this year’s Charging Pad. I like the prior design, and I have no need for the only technological upgrade in the fast charging Apple Watch module – which you can only use with the Series 7. With any other watch series, the charging ability remains the same, if not slightly worse, than the classic Apple charger. And as both chargers still cost $149.95, it seems the similarity is reflected in price.

The same goes for the Portable Fast Charger. If you have a Series 7 and need quick charges often, I think it’s very worth it. If your device is older than that, it will still work, but you’d essentially be paying $60 for a pretty bedside charger stand. I don’t see the point in spending the money when you’d be missing out on the main point of use.

If you’re looking for alternatives, plenty of similar chargers exist. But you’ll often be compromising for a cheaper price with fewer device charging modules, no MagSafe, or lower wattage. For those options, check out:

  • ZAGG 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Stand ($129.95)

  • Moderno Premium 3 in 1 Fast Wireless Charging Stand ($130)

  • Case-Mate Power Pad Pro 3-in-1 ($100)

  • Wireless Charger for Apple Watch ($9.99)

  • Moshi Flekto for Apple Watch ($50)

  • Belkin Travel Stand For Apple Watch ($19.99)

Explore related content:

  • The best fitness trackers for keeping up with your goals

  • These are the best online yoga platforms for practicing at home

  • The best workout equipment for building a home gym

NASA’s deep space satellite captures the dark shadow of an eclipse on Earth

At 1 million miles from Earth, the distant DSCOVR satellite, aka the Deep Space Climate Observatory, recently captured the moon’s eerie shadow over Antarctica.

The intriguing, relatively rare event occurred in the early hours of Dec. 4. The moon moved into a perfect position between Earth and the sun, called a total solar eclipse. NASA posted an image on Instagram showing the resulting shadow over Antarctica. Astronauts aboard the International Space Station spotted the eclipse, too.

“For a total solar eclipse to take place, the Sun, Moon, and Earth must line up exactly,” the space agency wrote.

Down in extremely remote Antarctica, few people (but likely many penguins) experienced the effects of the eclipse. It’s an eerie, otherworldly event. The moon blotches out the sun; the sky darkens; and the eclipse (by blocking the sun’s extreme radiance) reveals our star’s ghostly outer atmosphere, called the corona.

View this post on Instagram

From a distance over four times farther away than the moon, the six-year-old DSCOVR satellite regularly beams back a full view of Earth. It takes a picture every two hours.

One of DSCOVR’s primary missions, however, is to monitor space weather. This includes the solar wind, a beam of particles from the sun that can at times threaten to disrupt our power grids, cell phone networks, and beyond.

SEE ALSO:

NASA’s sci-fi mission to move an asteroid is crucial for humanity

We won’t experience a total solar eclipse in 2022. The next total solar eclipse on Earth will happen on April 20, 2023. But the following one on April 8, 2024 promises to be epic. It will pass over a wide swathe of land from Mexico, into Texas, and across the nation through Maine.

Twitter is testing content warnings on individual posts

Twitter is testing the ability to add content warnings to individual tweets, meaning you might soon be able to post thirst traps without causing your more innocent followers undue shock.

While Twitter’s settings currently allow you to mark all media you tweet as containing sensitive material, this all or nothing approach doesn’t allow for much nuance. It may be useful for sex workers or crime reporters who frequently post violent content, but it doesn’t accommodate discussions of graphic news events as they arise — or those one-off days when you’re just really feeling yourself. This new feature looks to provide a solution.

“People use Twitter to discuss what’s happening in the world, which sometimes means sharing unsettling or sensitive content,” the official Twitter Safety account wrote on Tuesday. “We’re testing an option for some of you to add one-time warnings to photos and videos you Tweet out, to help those who might want the warning.”

Mashable has reached out to Twitter for comment.

The content warning feature appears fairly simple to use. After attaching an image to a draft tweet, users can tap the “…” in the bottom right corner of the picture. From there, they’ll be able to add a content warning by selecting the flag on the bottom right corner of the screen. They will then need to indicate the reason why they’re adding a warning, marking it as either from “violence,” “nudity,” or “sensitive” content.

Once posted, the image will be blurred and overlaid with a message that the tweet’s author flagged it, and why it was flagged. It will only be visible to other users once they’ve agreed to view it, meaning it’s less likely people will be exposed to images that they’d rather not see.

It isn’t clear how widespread this test is, nor if or when the rest of us might see this feature. But it’s certainly a welcome tool that will hopefully help make doomscrolling through Twitter a little less doomy.